It is possible to take the view that there isn’t a must define the word “legislation” (e.g. “let’s neglect about generalities and get down to cases”).
In 1972, Baron Hampstead suggested that no such definition could possibly be produced. McCoubrey and White stated that the question “what is legislation?” has no simple answer. Glanville Williams said that the meaning of the word “law” depends on the context during which that word is used. He said that, for instance, “early customary regulation” and “municipal law” have been contexts where the word “regulation” had two totally different and irreconcilable meanings. Thurman Arnold said that it’s obvious that it’s unimaginable to outline the word “law” and that additionally it is equally apparent that the wrestle to define that word mustn’t ever be abandoned.
Writing in the early twentieth century, Max Weber believed that a definitive characteristic of a developed state had come to be its bureaucratic assist. Law professor and former United States Attorney General Edward H. Levi famous that the “fundamental pattern of legal reasoning is reasoning by example”–that’s, reasoning by comparing outcomes in instances resolving similar legal questions. Supreme Court case regarding procedural efforts taken by a debt assortment firm to keep away from errors, Justice Sotomayor cautioned that “legal reasoning isn’t a mechanical or strictly linear process”. There have been a number of attempts to provide “a universally acceptable definition of legislation”.
For an exposition of social restrictions and their enforcement, see censorship; crime and punishment; and police. For a description of the authorized elements of war and the navy, see warfare, regulation of. For international aspects of legislation, see international law; and United Nations.